tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7143395511928869444.post1172618712838535483..comments2024-01-02T13:37:26.563-06:00Comments on גֵּר־וְתוֹשָׁב: Paulinism on the brink of heresyd. millerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16844676267073730959noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7143395511928869444.post-15037182474494077272009-07-24T15:23:42.998-06:002009-07-24T15:23:42.998-06:00Considering that Isaiah 7 promises a child born of...Considering that Isaiah 7 promises a child born of a vigin who will be born in Ahaz's time and whose time of coming to know good and evil will be preceded by Ahaz's two enemy kings being defeated by the Assyrian king, and yet "Matthew" is not ashamed to apply this prophecy to a man born 1000 years too late to fulfill the prophecy, we must acknowlegde that scripture is not inerrant, that it has been added to by the Catholics. The real Matthew certainly didn't write this virgin birth blunder. And if the Catholcis added (which they did) the story of the virgin birth, then why not the whole epistle to the Romans, which disagrees with all Paul's other epistles? The Paul of Romans is not the same Paul we find everywhere else, certainly not in Acts! Tares have been sown among the wheat while we were asleep. Yetn we cannot simple remove them from the canon, but mustsuffer them to grow in it, while obviously not believing them along with the what itself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com