tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7143395511928869444.post6010586490505501192..comments2024-01-02T13:37:26.563-06:00Comments on גֵּר־וְתוֹשָׁב: Hoskyns & Davey on historical criticism as a necessity for Christian faithd. millerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16844676267073730959noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7143395511928869444.post-31888367597800204682011-05-11T09:14:22.361-06:002011-05-11T09:14:22.361-06:00I suppose they would respectfully disagree. Hoskyn...I suppose they would respectfully disagree. Hoskyns and Davey claim that their results, which happen to confirm traditional interpretations of the Bible and undercut early 20th century liberalism, are strictly historical.d. millerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16844676267073730959noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7143395511928869444.post-64761119788633302772011-05-11T06:56:37.631-06:002011-05-11T06:56:37.631-06:00In the latest JBL Vincent Wimbush makes a point ho...In the latest JBL Vincent Wimbush makes a point how biblical studies "sticks it" to the gendered and racialized Others, but he gives an interesting ad hoc assessment of biblical studies' historical interest: "its all too simple historicist agenda (masking in too many instances unacknowledged theological-apologetic interests)" (7).Jeromeynoreply@blogger.com